In information that will shock exactly zero folks, the couple who mentioned that they had been so unbelievably distressed by way of the prospect of comparable-intercourse marriage that they’d immediately divorce if it passes… usually are not doing that.
YOU magnificence: The Australian Parliament Has Voted sure To Marriage Equality
The Couple Who said They'd Divorce If SSM passed Have formally Chickened Out
talking to the daily Mail, Nick and Sarah Jensen are backpedalling furiously from their courageous defence of marriage from THE GAYS. As per a remark from Nick:
My previous public feedback relating to civil divorce never envisaged me isolating from my wife, however somewhat our marriage from the State. The law at present makes it untenable for us to try this under the regulation. the purpose we have been highlighting and that also stands however is the fact that a redefinition of marriage changes the settlement underneath which we had been originally married. we will be able to be making no additional remark.
Their authentic article in Canberra CityNews argued that their view “is that marriage is a basic order of introduction” and that any attempt to exchange the rest about it would be an assault on a “elementary and foundational constructing block of Australian society”. Sounds lovely severe! no longer critical sufficient for them to if truth be told do it, although.
Nick did if truth be told deal with the pesky problem of separation in an editorial for The Bible Society – in which he also assures the reader that this wasn’t just a stunt for publicity, however an precise deeply held perception.
obviously the problem is that a choose would no longer furnish us a State divorce as a result of we must express our marriage is irreconcilably damaged and be separated for a yr. this can be a minor drawback alternatively if a simple ‘annulment’ choice was once on hand in any rules for conscientious objectors such as ourselves.
Ah smartly. enjoyable while it lasted. experience your marriage, guys!